Palabras clave
higher education
language instruction
vocabulary
escritura académica
educación superior
instrucción del lenguaje
vocabulario
Cómo citar
Resumen
Este artículo examina el uso del vocabulario de los estudiantes de inglés como lengua extranjera (ILE) en la escritura académica. A pesar de su importancia, el vocabulario especifico que los estudiantes utilizan en contextos académicos de ILE no ha recibido la suficiente atención. Este estudio se llevó a cabo con 31 estudiantes ILE de una universi- dad pública en Costa Rica durante un año. El investigador recolectó datos provenientes del trabajo final de investigación de los estudiantes utilizando programas especializados. Los datos indican que: 1) la variedad del léxico está por encima del promedio, 2) el voca- bulario académico de los estudiantes es alto pero no incluye todos los posibles subtipos, 3) los estudiantes se encuentran entre un nivel C1 y C2 en la distribución del perfil de vocabulario en inglés (EVP), y 4) los marcadores metadiscursivos son utilizado pero alta- mente repetitivos en los trabajos de los estudiantes. Estas conclusiones se asemejan a la literatura consultada, pero sugieren una gran variabilidad entre diferentes poblaciones. Además, el análisis sugiere que la instrucción directa puede incrementar el léxico de los estudiantes. Estos resultados deben servir para implementar nuevas estrategias de aprendizaje que estimulen la evaluación curricular del plan de estudios.
Citas
Akbari, N. (2017). Lexical diversity and the use of academic and lower frequency words in the academic writing of EFL students. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 40(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.40.1.02akb
Akmajian, A., Farmer, A. K., Bickmore, L., Demers, R. A., & Harnish, R. M. (Eds.). (2017). Linguistics: an introduction to language and communication (Seventh edition). The MIT Press.
Alfter, D., Bizzoni, Y., Agebjörn, A., Volodina, E., & Pilán, I. (2016). From distributions to labels: A lexical proficiency analysis using learner corpora. Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on NLP for Computer Assisted Language Learning and NLP for Language Acquisition, 1–7. https://aclanthology.org/W16-6501
Alhojailan, A. I. (2019). The Effect of Academic Vocabulary Use on Graduate Students’ Writing Assignment Scores. English Language Teaching, 12(9), 33. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n9p33
Baker, A., & Hengeveld, K. (Eds.). (2012). Linguistics: the basics. John Wiley & Sons.
Barros, L. O. (2016). The only academic phrasebook you’ll ever need: 600 examples of academic language. Amazon Fulfillment.
Bax, S., Nakatsuhara, F., & Waller, D. (2019). Researching L2 writers’ use of metadiscourse markers at intermediate and advanced levels. System, 83, 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.02.010
Bax, S. (2012). Text Inspector. Online text analysis tool. Available at: https://textinspector.com/.
Cardullo, V., Finley, S., Burton, M., & Tripp, L. O. (2017). Attitudes, Perceptions, and Knowledge - Academic Language and Academic Vocabulary of Pre-Service Teachers. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 17(9). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v17i9.1418
Charpentier-Jiménez, W. (2019). University Students Use of Academic Vocabulary in the BA in English and English Teaching. Revista De Lenguas Modernas, 30(2).
Cheng, X., & Steffensen, M. S. (1996). Metadiscourse: A Technique for Improving Student Writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 30(2), 149–181. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171358
Council of Europe (Ed.). (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment ; companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing.
Coxhead, A. (2000). A New Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951
Coxhead, A. (2006). Essentials of teaching academic vocabulary. Houghton Mifflin Co.
Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. S. (1993). Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing: A Study of Texts Written by American and Finnish University Students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Predicting second language writing proficiency: the roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication: PREDICTING L2 WRITING PROFICIENCY. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01449.x
Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., McNamara, D. S., & Jarvis, S. (2011). Predicting lexical proficiency in language learner texts using computational indices. Language Testing, 28(4), 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210378031
Dastjerdi, H. V., Shirzad, M., & Student, M. (2010). The Impact of Explicit Instruction of Metadiscourse Markers on EFL Learners’ Writing Performance. https://doi.org/10.22099/JTLS.2012.412
Duran, P., Malvern, D., Richards, B., & Chipere, N. (2004). Developmental Trends in Lexical Diversity, Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 220-242. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.220
Durrant, P. (2016). To what extent is the Academic Vocabulary List relevant to university student writing? English for Specific Purposes, 43, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.01.004
Erarslan, A. (2021). Correlation between Metadiscourse, Lexical Complexity, Readability and Writing Performance in EFL University Students’ Research-based Essays. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(S1-May), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9iS1-May.4017
Fergadiotis, G., Wright, H. H., & Green, S. B. (2015). Psychometric Evaluation of Lexical Diversity Indices: Assessing Length Effects. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(3), 840–852. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0280
Foster, P., & Tavakoli, P. (2009). Native Speakers and Task Performance: Comparing Effects on Complexity, Fluency, and Lexical Diversity. Language Learning, 59(4), 866–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00528.x
Granger, S., & Larsson, T. (2021). Is core vocabulary a friend or foe of academic writing? Single-word vs multi-word uses of thing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 52, 100999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100999
Gu, X., & Xu, Z. (2021). Sustainable Development of EFL Learners’ Research Writing Competence and Their Identity Construction: Chinese Novice Writer-Researchers’ Metadiscourse Use in English Research Articles. Sustainability, 13(17), 9523. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179523
Ha, H. S. (2019). Lexical Richness in EFL Undergraduate Students’ Academic Writing. ENGLISH TEACHING, 74(3), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.74.3.201909.3
Howe, S., & Henriksson, K. (2007). Phrasebook for writing papers and research in english: over 5000 words and phrases to help you write at university and research level in English (4. ed). Whole World Company Press.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2010). Metadiscourse: Mapping Interactions in Academic Writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.220
Hyland, K. (2019). Metadiscourse: exploring interaction in writing. Bloomsbury Academic.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2007). Is There an “Academic Vocabulary”? TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00058.x
Jarvis, S., & Daller, H. (Eds.). (2013a). Vocabulary knowledge: human ratings and automated measures. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Jarvis, S., & Daller, H. (Eds.). (2013b). Vocabulary knowledge: human ratings and automated measures. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kaya, F., & Sofu, H. (2020). Exploring Effects of Explicit Teaching of Metadiscourse Markers on EFL Students’ Writing Proficiency. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 20(2).
Koizumi, R., & In’nami, Y. (2012). Effects of text length on lexical diversity measures: Using short texts with less than 200 tokens. System, 40(4), 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.10.012
Leńko-Szymańska, A. (2015). The English Vocabulary Profile as a benchmark for assigning levels to learner corpus data. In M. Callies & S. Götz (Eds.), Studies in Corpus Linguistics (Vol. 70, pp. 115–140). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.70.05len
Lessard-Clouston, M. (2013). Word Lists for Vocabulary Learning and Teaching. Undefined. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Word-Lists-for-Vocabulary-Learning-and-Teaching.-Lessard-Clouston/8ee32f800d6ae7dd175527c88af4e9625d77f1d3
Mat Zali, M., Mohamad, R., Setia, R., Raja Baniamin, R. M., & Mohd Razlan, R. (2021). Comparisons of Interactive and Interactional Metadiscourse among Undergraduates. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(4), 21. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i4.11946
Matthews, P. H. (2014). The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics (Third edition). Oxford University Press.
McCarthy, P. M. (2005). An assessment of the range and usefulness of lexical diversity measures and the potential of the measure of textual, lexical diversity (MTLD) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Memphis). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations &Theses (p. 199485).
McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2007). vocd: A theoretical and empirical evaluation. Language Testing, 24(4), 459–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207080767
McDonough, K., Neumann, H., & Hubert-Smith, N. (2018). How Accurately do English for Academic Purposes Students use Academic Word List Words? BC TEAL Journal, 3(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.14288/bctj.v3i1.293
McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & McCarthy, P. M. (2010). Linguistic Features of Writing Quality. Written Communication, 27(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309351547
Mei Hooi, C., Tan, H., Lee, G. I., & Victor Danarajan, S. S. (2020). Texts with Metadiscourse Features are More Engaging: A Fact or A Myth? 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 26(4), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2020-2604-05
Milanovic, M. (2009). Cambridge ESOL and the CEFR. Research Notes, (37) 2–5. Cambridge: Cambridge ESOL.
Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Multiligual Matters.
Morris, L., & Cobb, T. (2004a). Vocabulary profiles as predictors of the academic performance of Teaching English as a Second Language trainees. System, 32(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2003.05.001
Morris, L., & Cobb, T. (2004b). Vocabulary profiles as predictors of the academic performance of Teaching English as a Second Language trainees. System, 32(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2003.05.001
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (Second Edition). Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (2016). Making and using word lists for language learning and testing. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Owen, N., Shrestha, P., & Bax, S. (2021). Researching lexical thresholds and lexical profiles across the common European framework of reference for languages (CEFR) levels assessed in the Aptis test. ARAGs Research Reports Online, AR-G/2021(1). https://www.britishcouncil.org/exam/aptis/research/publications/arags/researching-lexical-thresholds-and-lexical-profiles-across
Pavičić Takač, V. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies and foreign language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
Radford, A. (Ed.). (2010). Linguistics: an introduction (2. ed., 3. print). Cambridge Univ. Press.
Ransdell, S., & Wengelin, A. (2003). Socioeconomic and sociolinguistic predictors of
children’s L2 and L1 writing quality. Arob@se, 1-2, 22-29
Reynolds, B. L. (2015). A Mixed-Methods Approach to Investigating First-and Second-Language Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition Through the Reading of Fiction. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 111–127. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43497208
Sanford, S. (2012). A COMPARISON OF METADISCOURSE MARKERS AND WRITING QUALITY IN ADOLESCENT WRITTEN NARRATIVES. Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1366
Sešek, U. (2016). Revising and Metadiscourse in Advanced EFL/ESL Writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(3), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.3p.35
Stills, M. (2016). Language Sample Length Effects on Various Lexical Diversity Measures: An Analysis of Spanish Language Samples from Children. University Honors Theses. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.250
Sun, D. (2017a). A Contrastive Analysis between English Vocabulary Profile and College English Wordlist. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(9), 729. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0709.04
Sun, D. (2017b). The CEFR Stratification of English Productive Vocabulary of Chinese University Undergraduates Based on DIY Learner English Corpus. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(5), 909. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0805.09
Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some explanatory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36)
Vidal, K., & Jarvis, S. (2020). Effects of English-medium instruction on Spanish students’ proficiency and lexical diversity in English. Language Teaching Research, 24(5), 568–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818817945
Webb, S. A., & Nation, I. S. P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.
Yaghoubi, A., & Ardestani, S. (2014). Explicit or Implicit Instruction of Metadiscourse Markers and Writing Skill Improvement. https://doi.org/10.7575/AIAC.IJALEL.V.3N.4P.14
Yüksel, H. G., & Kavanoz, S. (2018). Dimension of Experience: Metadiscourse in the Texts of Novice Non-Native, Novice Native and Expert Native Speaker. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(3), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.3p.104
Comentarios
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2023 William Charpentier Jiménez