Yield and quality of five BMR sorghum varieties in the dry tropics of Costa Rica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/92vc9027Keywords:
brown midrib mutants, silage, feed efficiency, nutritive valueAbstract
Introduction. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) is a C4 grass recognized for its high productivity and tolerance to heat and drought stress, widely used in animal feeding. The incorporation of the Brown Midrib (BMR) gene enhances its forage value by reducing fiber content and increasing digestibility. Objective. To evaluate the productive performance and bromatological quality of five BMR sorghum varieties in order to identify those with the greatest potential for use in cattle feeding. Materials and methods. The study was conducted at the Enrique Jiménez Núñez Experimental Station (Cañas, Guanacaste, Costa Rica) during the 2020 rainy season and the 2021 dry season (under irrigation). A randomized complete block design with four replications was used. Treatments included five BMR lines (0916, 0919, 0925, 0929, and 0936), derived from crosses between BMR materials from Texas (USA) and Central American germplasm. Forage Black Sorghum (Sorghum almum) was used as the control. Agronomic traits and nutritional quality of fresh and ensiled forage were evaluated. Results. Although the BMR varieties showed lower biomass production and shorter crop cycles than the control, they exhibited superior nutritional quality in both seasons. Conclusions. BMR sorghum varieties had lower biomass yield than Forage Black Sorghum but showed nutritional advantages, supporting their potential as a strategic forage alternative in cattle production systems of the Costa Rican dry tropics.
Downloads
References
Adams, R. S. (1994). Regression equations for estimating energy values of various feeds. En V. Ishler (Ed.), From feed to milk: understanding rumen function (pp. 14-27). Pennsylvania State University.
Aloba, T. A., Corea, E. E., Mendoza, M., Dickhoefer, U., & Castro-Montoya, J. (2022). Effects of ensiling length and storage temperature on the nutritive value and fiber-bound protein of three tropical legumes ensiled alone or combined with sorghum. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 283, Artículo 115172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115172
Amador, A. L., & Boschini, C. (2000). Calidad nutricional de la planta de sorgo negro forrajero (Sorghum almum) para alimentación animal. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 11(2), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v11i2.17315
AOAC International. (2002). Official methods of analysis (17.ª ed.). AOAC International.
Bean, B. W., Baumhardt, R. L., McCollum III, F. T., & McCuistion, K. C. (2013). Comparison of sorghum classes for grain and forage yield and forage nutritive value. Field Crops Research, 142, 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.014
Doggett, H. (1988). Sorghum (2nd ed.). Longman Scientific & Technical.
Ferreira, D. de J., Costa Neta, C. de M., Zanine, A. de M., Santos, F. N. de S., Pereira, D. M., Campos, F. S., Parente, H. N., Parente, M. de O. M., Rodrigues, R. C., Santos, E. M., Sousa, F. C. da S. de, & Alves, G. R. (2024). Sustainable production of forage sorghum for grain and silage production with moisture-retaining polymers that mitigate water stress. Agronomy, 14(8), Artículo 1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081653
Ferreira, D. A., Gonçalves, L. C., Maurício, R. M., Pereira, L. G. R., & Rodrigues, J. A. S. (2018). Ruminal degradability of brown-midrib sorghum-Sudangrass hybrids for cutting and grazing. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 49(1), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20180016
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (s. f.). FAOSTAT: Crops and livestock products. Recuperado el 10 de marzo de 2026 de https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL
Guevara, A. L. (1988). Desarrollo de la investigación en sorgo de Costa Rica. CEIBA, 29(2), 221-229. https://bdigital.zamorano.edu/bitstream/11036/4343/1/09%20U.pdf
Heuzé, V., Tran, G., & Lebas, F. (2015, 8 de octubre). Sorghum grain. Feedipedia. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/224
Instituto Meteorológico Nacional. (2021). Datos climáticos de la Estación Meteorológica Canta Gallo, Pococí, Limón [Base de datos]. https://www.imn.ac.cr/
Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica. (2014). Atlas digital de Costa Rica [CD-ROM].
Kaiser, A. G., Piltz, J. W., Burns, H. M., & Griffiths, N. W. (2004). Successful silage (2nd ed.). Dairy Australia, & New South Wales Department of Primary Industries.
Machado, F. S., Rodríguez, N. M., Gonçalves, L. C., Rodrigues, J. A. S., Ribas, M. N., Pôssas, F. P., Jayme, D. G., Pereira, L. G. R., Chaves, A. V., & Tomich, T. R. (2015). Energy partitioning and methane emission by sheep fed sorghum silages at different maturation stages. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 67(3), 790-800. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-7177
Marsalis, M. A., Angadi, S. V., & Contreras-Govea, F. E. (2010). Dry matter yield and nutritive value of corn, forage sorghum, and BMR forage sorghum at different plant populations and nitrogen rates. Field Crops Research, 116(1), 52-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.11.009
Martínez, A. (2018). Tabla de composición bromatológica de forrajes utilizados para la alimentación de animales en Costa Rica. Universidad de Costa Rica.
McCollum, F. T., McCuistion, K., & Bean, B. (2005). Brown midrib and photoperiod-sensitive forage sorghums. En T. C. Jenkins & C. W. Rogers (Eds.), Proceedings of the Plains Nutrition Council Spring Conference (pp. 36-46). Texas A&M University.
McDonald, P., Henderson, A. R., & Heron, S. J. E. (1991). The biochemistry of silage. Chalcombe Publications.
Moura, M. M. A., Mizobutsi, E. H., De Campos, M. L., Costa, R. F., Pires Neto, O. S., Soares Santos, L. C., & Batista Fernandes, M. (2025). Assessment of the agronomic and nutritional characteristics of sorghum genotypes with and without brown midrib. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 47, Artículo e67709. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v47i1.67709
Oliver, A. L., Pedersen, J. F., Grant, R. J., & Klopfenstein, T. J. (2005). Comparative effects of the sorghum bmr-6 and bmr-12 genes: I. Forage sorghum yield and quality. Crop Science, 45(6), 2234-2239. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0644
Pupo, M. R., Wallau, M. O., & Ferraretto, L. F. (2022). Effects of season, variety type, and trait on dry matter yield, nutrient composition, and predicted intake and milk yield of whole-plant sorghum forage. Journal of Dairy Science, 105(7), 5776-5785. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-21706
Sattler, S. E., Funnell-Harris, D. L., & Pedersen, J. F. (2010). Brown midrib mutations and their importance to the utilization of maize, sorghum, and pearl millet lignocellulosic tissues. Plant Science, 178(3), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.01.001
Stypinski, J. D., Weiss, W. P., Carroll, A. L., & Kononoff, P. J. (2024). Effect of acid detergent lignin concentration for diets formulated to be similar in neutral detergent fiber content on energy utilization in lactating Jersey cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 107(8), 5699-5708. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-24318
Suhartanto, B., Umami, N., Yusiati, L. M., Pangesti, A. W., & Dewanti, M. S. (2024). Forage yield, nutrient content and in vitro digestibility of Super-2 and brown midrib resistance (BMR) sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) varieties as forage crops. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 23, 330-337. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2024.330.337
Traxler, M. J., Fox, D. G., Van Soest, P. J., Pell, A. N., Lascano, C. E., Lanna, D. P., Moore, J. E., Lana, R. P., Vélez, M., & Flores, A. (1998). Predicting forage indigestible NDF from lignin concentration. Journal of Animal Science, 76(5), 1469-1480. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.7651469x
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
Widodo, S., Indriatama, W. M., Anggraeny, Y. N., Sholikin, M. M., Jayanegara, A., & Wahyono, T. (2025). Forage biomass and nutrient quality in brown midrib (BMR) compared to conventional sorghum: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 12(1), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2025.l883
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 José Roberto Camacho-Montero, José Pablo Jiménez-Castro, Josselyne Aguilar-López, William Sánchez-Ledezma, Nevio Bonilla-Morales (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
