Perception and Uses of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Relation to the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/hhvhvg32Keywords:
artificial intelligence, perception, student, taxonomyAbstract
In recent years, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has experienced an explosive growth in everyday life, at work, and in academia. This research aims to identify the perceptions regarding the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) among college students from the Atlantic Branch of the University of Costa Rica in 2024, and to describe these uses from a cognitive perspective through the relationship with the revised Bloom’s taxonomy. This study follows a quantitative design and approach. The survey was used as a data collection technique and the sample was selected using criteria of convenience and voluntary participation. The findings show that at the memory level students mainly use GAI to look up definitions of concepts (60.4%), whereas at the comprehension level to look up examples of information or concepts (63.5%). At the application level students use GAI to translate texts from Spanish into other languages; at the analysis level to solicit characteristics, properties, dimensions of a phenomenon (37.5%). At the evaluation level students primarily use GAI to correct the grammar of their own texts (43.8%), and at the creation level to produce brainstorms (50%). The conclusions suggest that students predominantly utilize GAI for lower-level cognitive processes like memorizing, comprehending and applying. Students also consider that they make an ethical use of GAI that enhances their academic progress. However, due to the novelty of the topic, it is necessary to continue researching in this area.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, Kashif., Iqbal, Waleed., El-Hassan, Ammar., Qadir, Junaid., Benhadd, Driss., Ayyash, Moussa., y Al-Fuqaha, Ala. (2020). Data-driven artificial intelligence in education: A comprehensive review. Preprint server EdArXv, 1-42. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/zvu2n
Anderson, Lorin W., and Krathwohl, David R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson Education.
Anderson, Nash., Belavy, Daniel., Perle, Stephen., Hendricks, Sharief., Hespanhol, Luiz., Verhagen, Evert., y Memon, Aamir. (2023). AI did not write this manuscript, or did it? Can we trick the AI text detector into generated texts? The potential future of ChatGPT and AI in Sports & Exercise Medicine manuscript generation. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 9(1), 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001568
Ausubel, David Paul., y Robinson, Floyd G. (1969). School learning: An introduction to educational psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ausubel, David Paul. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. Grune & Stratton.
Babbie, Earl. (2016). The Practice of Social Research (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Baek, Clare., Tate, Tamara., y Warschauer, Mark. (2024). “ChatGPT seems too good to be true”: College students’ use and perceptions on generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100294
Bloom, Benjamin S. (Ed). (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I, The Cognitive Domain. Longmans. https://bit.ly/4jWdJoU
Bruner, Jerome. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press.
Casas Anguita, Juana., Repullo Labradora, José Ramón., y Donado Campos, Juan de Mata. (2003). La encuesta como técnica de investigación. Elaboración de cuestionarios y tratamiento estadístico de los datos (II). Revista Aten Primaria, 31(9), 592-600. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7681832/pdf/main.pdf
Castelló, Montserrat. (2007). El proceso de composición de textos académicos. En Montserrat Castelló (Ed.), Escribir y comunicarse en contextos científicos y académicos. Conocimientos y estrategias (pp. 47-81). Graó.
Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk., y Hu, Wenjie. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(43), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Escalante, José Luis. (2024). Actitud de los estudiantes universitarios de Educación ante el uso de la inteligencia artificial. Ciencia y Sociedad, 49(2), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.22206/cys.2024.v49i2.3082
García-Martínez, Inmaculada., Fernández-Batanero, José María., Fernández-Cerero, José., y León, Samuel. (2023). Analysing the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Computational Sciences on Student Performance: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(1), 171-197. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.1.1240
García-Peñalvo, Francisco. (2023). La percepción de la Inteligencia Artificial en contextos educativos tras el lanzamiento de ChatGPT: disrupción o pánico. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 24, 1 – 9. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.31279
Hernán Losada, Isidoro. (2012). Diseño de software educativo para la enseñanza de la programación orientada a objetos basado en la taxonomía de Bloom. [Tesis doctoral, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos]. http://hdl.handle.net/10115/11403
Hernández-Sampieri, Roberto., y Mendoza Torres, Christian Paulina. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Interamericana Editores, S.A.
Litman, Diane. (2016). Natural language processing for enhancing teaching and learning. Thirtieth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v30i1.9879
Ngo, Thi Thuy An. (2023). The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(7), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019
Pavlovic, Dragana., Soler-Adillon, Joan., y Stanislavljevic-Petrovic, Zorica. (2024). Un profesor particular a tiempo completo: ChatGPT desde el punto de vista de los estudiantes universitarios. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 24(82), 563-584. https://doi.org/10.22550/2174-0909.4160
Piaget, Jean. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International University Press.
Piaget, Jean. (1954). The Child's Construction of Reality. Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
Piaget, Jean. (1972). Psychology and Epistemology: Towards a Theory of Knowledge. Penguin (Non-Classics).
Romero-Rodríguez, José-María., Ramírez-Montoya, María-Soledad., Buenestado-Fernández, Mariana., y Lara-lara, Fernando. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at University as a Tool for Complex Thinking: Students’ Perceived Usefulness. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458
Soto, José Luis., y Reyes, Itzel Alessandra. (2024). Apreciaciones de estudiantes universitarios sobre el uso de ChatGPT. Revista Paraguaya de Educación a Distancia, 5(2), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.56152/reped2024-dossierIA1-art5
Teberosky, Anna. (2007). El texto académico. En Montserrat Castelló (Ed.), Escribir y comunicarse en contextos científicos y académicos. Conocimientos y estrategias (pp. 17-46). Graó.
Wollny, Sebastian., Schneider, Jan., Di Mitri, Daniele., Weidlich, Joshua., Rittberger, Marc., y Drachsler, Hendrik. (2021). Are we there yet? - A systematic literature review on chatbots in education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 1-18. .https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.654924
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alexa Bolaños Carpio, Carol Flores Solano (Autor/a)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All published articles and essays are protected by Creative Commons (CC) licenses, under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike - CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 standard, which constitute a complement to traditional copyright, under the following terms : first, the authorship of the referred document must always be acknowledged; second, no article or essay published in the ACTUALIDADES INVESTIGATIVES EN EDUCACIÓN Magazine can have commercial purposes of any nature; and third, adaptations of the manuscript must be shared under the same terms.
The journal allows the author to hold their copyright without restriction, but the author must inform that the article or essay were published first through this journal to avoid coincidences with other journals in the future.