Perception and Uses of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Relation to the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/hhvhvg32

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, perception, student, taxonomy

Abstract

In recent years, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has experienced an explosive growth in everyday life, at work, and in academia. This research aims to identify the perceptions regarding the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) among college students from the Atlantic Branch of the University of Costa Rica in 2024, and to describe these uses from a cognitive perspective through the relationship with the revised Bloom’s taxonomy. This study follows a quantitative design and approach. The survey was used as a data collection technique and the sample was selected using criteria of convenience and voluntary participation. The findings show that at the memory level students mainly use GAI to look up definitions of concepts (60.4%), whereas at the comprehension level to look up examples of information or concepts (63.5%). At the application level students use GAI to translate texts from Spanish into other languages; at the analysis level to solicit characteristics, properties, dimensions of a phenomenon (37.5%). At the evaluation level students primarily use GAI to correct the grammar of their own texts (43.8%), and at the creation level to produce brainstorms (50%). The conclusions suggest that students predominantly utilize GAI for lower-level cognitive processes like memorizing, comprehending and applying. Students also consider that they make an ethical use of GAI that enhances their academic progress. However, due to the novelty of the topic, it is necessary to continue researching in this area. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, Kashif., Iqbal, Waleed., El-Hassan, Ammar., Qadir, Junaid., Benhadd, Driss., Ayyash, Moussa., y Al-Fuqaha, Ala. (2020). Data-driven artificial intelligence in education: A comprehensive review. Preprint server EdArXv, 1-42. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/zvu2n

Anderson, Lorin W., and Krathwohl, David R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson Education.

Anderson, Nash., Belavy, Daniel., Perle, Stephen., Hendricks, Sharief., Hespanhol, Luiz., Verhagen, Evert., y Memon, Aamir. (2023). AI did not write this manuscript, or did it? Can we trick the AI text detector into generated texts? The potential future of ChatGPT and AI in Sports & Exercise Medicine manuscript generation. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 9(1), 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001568

Ausubel, David Paul., y Robinson, Floyd G. (1969). School learning: An introduction to educational psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Ausubel, David Paul. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. Grune & Stratton.

Babbie, Earl. (2016). The Practice of Social Research (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Baek, Clare., Tate, Tamara., y Warschauer, Mark. (2024). “ChatGPT seems too good to be true”: College students’ use and perceptions on generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100294

Bloom, Benjamin S. (Ed). (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I, The Cognitive Domain. Longmans. https://bit.ly/4jWdJoU

Bruner, Jerome. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press.

Casas Anguita, Juana., Repullo Labradora, José Ramón., y Donado Campos, Juan de Mata. (2003). La encuesta como técnica de investigación. Elaboración de cuestionarios y tratamiento estadístico de los datos (II). Revista Aten Primaria, 31(9), 592-600. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7681832/pdf/main.pdf

Castelló, Montserrat. (2007). El proceso de composición de textos académicos. En Montserrat Castelló (Ed.), Escribir y comunicarse en contextos científicos y académicos. Conocimientos y estrategias (pp. 47-81). Graó.

Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk., y Hu, Wenjie. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(43), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Escalante, José Luis. (2024). Actitud de los estudiantes universitarios de Educación ante el uso de la inteligencia artificial. Ciencia y Sociedad, 49(2), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.22206/cys.2024.v49i2.3082

García-Martínez, Inmaculada., Fernández-Batanero, José María., Fernández-Cerero, José., y León, Samuel. (2023). Analysing the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Computational Sciences on Student Performance: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(1), 171-197. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.1.1240

García-Peñalvo, Francisco. (2023). La percepción de la Inteligencia Artificial en contextos educativos tras el lanzamiento de ChatGPT: disrupción o pánico. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 24, 1 – 9. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.31279

Hernán Losada, Isidoro. (2012). Diseño de software educativo para la enseñanza de la programación orientada a objetos basado en la taxonomía de Bloom. [Tesis doctoral, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos]. http://hdl.handle.net/10115/11403

Hernández-Sampieri, Roberto., y Mendoza Torres, Christian Paulina. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Interamericana Editores, S.A.

Litman, Diane. (2016). Natural language processing for enhancing teaching and learning. Thirtieth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v30i1.9879

Ngo, Thi Thuy An. (2023). The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(7), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019

Pavlovic, Dragana., Soler-Adillon, Joan., y Stanislavljevic-Petrovic, Zorica. (2024). Un profesor particular a tiempo completo: ChatGPT desde el punto de vista de los estudiantes universitarios. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 24(82), 563-584. https://doi.org/10.22550/2174-0909.4160

Piaget, Jean. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International University Press.

Piaget, Jean. (1954). The Child's Construction of Reality. Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.

Piaget, Jean. (1972). Psychology and Epistemology: Towards a Theory of Knowledge. Penguin (Non-Classics).

Romero-Rodríguez, José-María., Ramírez-Montoya, María-Soledad., Buenestado-Fernández, Mariana., y Lara-lara, Fernando. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at University as a Tool for Complex Thinking: Students’ Perceived Usefulness. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458

Soto, José Luis., y Reyes, Itzel Alessandra. (2024). Apreciaciones de estudiantes universitarios sobre el uso de ChatGPT. Revista Paraguaya de Educación a Distancia, 5(2), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.56152/reped2024-dossierIA1-art5

Teberosky, Anna. (2007). El texto académico. En Montserrat Castelló (Ed.), Escribir y comunicarse en contextos científicos y académicos. Conocimientos y estrategias (pp. 17-46). Graó.

Wollny, Sebastian., Schneider, Jan., Di Mitri, Daniele., Weidlich, Joshua., Rittberger, Marc., y Drachsler, Hendrik. (2021). Are we there yet? - A systematic literature review on chatbots in education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 1-18. .https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.654924

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Perception and Uses of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Relation to the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. (2025). Actualidades Investigativas En Educación, 25(3), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.15517/hhvhvg32