Agronomic characteristics of maralfalfa (Pennisetum sp.) seedlings according to sowing and harvesting density
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/nkf43w60Keywords:
elephant grass, asexual seed, cutting, internodeAbstract
Introduction. Maralfalfa (Pennisetum sp.) stands out for its forage productivity in tropical regions; however, technical evidence regarding its management for propagule production is insufficient. The quality of asexual seed is subject to agronomic factors that determine stem robustness and physiological maturity. Objective. To evaluate the effect of planting density and the number of harvests on the yield and morphometric characteristics of maralfalfa as a seed nursery. Materials and methods. The study was conducted in Huaral, Peru (2018-2019), using a completely randomized design with a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement. Three planting densities (0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 m between plants; 0.80 m between rows) and two harvests (120 days post-planting and 90 days post-cut) were evaluated. Fresh biomass yield (FBY), plant height (PH), stem weight (SW), number of tillers per plant (NTP), stem diameter (SD), and number of stem nodes (NSN) were quantified. Results. No significant interaction between factors was detected (p > 0.05). FBY, SW, and NTP were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the second harvest, with increases of 45 % (1.45 vs. 1.00 kg/plant), 29 % (564.31 vs. 437.30 g), and 10 % (3.79 vs. 3.45 tillers), respectively. The largest SD was obtained with a density of 1.00 m (3.97 cm; p < 0.05), while a density of 0.50 m produced plants with higher PH (3.80 m; p < 0.05) and NSN (15 nodes; p < 0.05). Conclusions. The second harvest optimized yield and tillering due to the consolidation of the root system. For propagule production, the 1.00 m spacing favored robustness, as reflected in stem diameter, whereas the 0.50 m spacing maximized node availability per unit area, allowing differentiated management according to the objective of the seedbed.
Downloads
References
Anders, A., Markowski, P., Konopka, S., Kaliniewicz, Z., Lipinski, A. J., & Choszcz, D. J. (2020). Effect of seeding rate on selected physical parameters and biomass yield of maize. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 80(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392020000200171
Cao, D., Chabikwa, T., Barbier, F., Dun, E. A., Fichtner, F., Dong, L., Kerr, S. C., & Beveridge, C. A. (2023). Auxin-independent effects of apical dominance induce changes in phytohormones correlated with bud outgrowth. Plant Physiology, 192(2), 1420-1434. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiad034
Cerdas-Ramírez, R. (2015). Comportamiento productivo del pasto maralfalfa (Pennisetum sp.) con varias dosis de fertilización nitrogenada. InterSedes, 16(33), 124-145. https://www.scielo.sa.cr/pdf/is/v16n33/a07v16n33.pdf
Criscioni, P., Marti, J.V., Pérez-Baena, I., Palomares, J. L., Larsen, T., & Fernández, C. (2016). Replacement of alfalfa hay (Medicago sativa) with maralfalfa hay (Pennisetum sp.) in diets of lactating dairy goats. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 219, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.020
Dong, B., Wang, Z., Evers, J. B., Stomph, T. J., Van der Putten, P. E. L., Yin, X., Wang, J. L., Sprangers, T., Hang, X., & Van der Werf, W. (2024). Competition for light and nitrogen with an earlier-sown species negatively affects leaf traits and leaf photosynthetic capacity of maize in relay intercropping. European Journal of Agronomy, 155, Artículo 127119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2024.127119
Duan, M., Zhang, X., Wei, Z., Chen, X., & Zhang, B. (2024). Effect of maize canopy structure on light interception and radiation use efficiency at different canopy layers. Agronomy, 14(7), Artículo 1511. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071511
Gawinowski, M., Enjalbert, J., Cournède, P. H., & Flutre, T. (2024). Contrasted reaction norms of wheat yield in pure vs mixed stands explained by tillering plasticities and shade avoidance. Field Crops Research, 310, Artículo 109368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109368
Guzman, M., Vilain, L., Rondon, T., & Sanchez, J. (2019). Sowing density effects in cotton yields and its components. Agronomy, 9(7), Artículo 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9070349
Islam, M. R., Garcia, S. C., Sarker, N. R., Islam, M. A., & Clark, C. E. (2023). Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum) management strategies for dairy and meat production in the tropics and subtropics: yield and nutritive value. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, Artículo 1269976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1269976
Li, L., van de Kaa, Y., van der Krabben, L., Pierik, R., & Kajala, K. (2025). Effect of low red-to-far-red light on stem elongation and pith cell development in dicots. Plant Direct, 9(4), Artículo e70072. https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.70072
Maldonado-Quiñones, H., Carrete-Carreón, F. O., Reyes-Estrada, O., Sánchez-Arroyo, J. F., Murillo-Ortiz, M., & Araiza-Rosales, E. E. (2021). Rendimiento y valor nutricional del pasto maralfalfa (Pennisetum sp.) a diferentes edades. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 44(2), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2021.2.143
Mengistu, G., Kebede, G., Faji, M., Feyissa, F., Mohammed, K., Kehaliew, A., Geleti, D., Minta, M., Balehegn, M., Rios, E. F., Adesogan, A. T., Dubeux, J. C. B., Jr., & Boote, K. J. (2024). Morphological characteristics, dry matter yield, and nutritive value of maralfalfa grass (Pennisetum spp.) grown under different planting densities in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Frontiers in Animal Science, 4, Artículo 1308911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2023.1308911
Postma, J. A., Hecht, V. L., Hikosaka, K., Nord, E. A., Pons, T. L., & Poorter, H. (2021). Dividing the pie: A quantitative review on plant density responses. Plant, Cell & Environment, 44(4), 1072-1094. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13968
Quevedo, Y. M., Beltrán, J. I., & Barragán-Quijano, E. (2018). Effect of sowing density on yield and profitability of a hybrid corn under tropical conditions. Agronomía Colombiana, 36(3), 248-256. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v36n3.71268
Quispe Varillas, R. C., & Maguiña-Maza, R. M. (2019). Métodos de siembra de Pennisetum sp. “maralfalfa” en el rendimiento forrajero. Infinitum, 9(2), 95-98. https://doi.org/10.51431/infinitum.v9i2.575
Ruiz Cárdenas, R. R. (2016). Establecimiento y respuesta a la frecuencia de corte de maralfalfa (Pennisetum sp.) vs. Camerun (Pennisetum purpureum Schum. cv. Cameroon) en el distrito de Contamana, provincia de Ucayali, Loreto [Tesis de pregrado, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina]. Repositorio Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/2612
Servicio Nacional de Meteorología e Hidrología. (s. f.). Datos meteorológicos de la estación Lomas de Lachay (Lima), periodo noviembre 2018-junio 2019. Recuperado el 16 de abril de 2026 de https://www.senamhi.gob.pe/main.php?dp=lima&p=estaciones
Sosa, D. (2006). Digestibilidad de maralfalfa (Pennisetum sp.) en cabras. Boletín Técnico, Serie Zoológica, 6(2), 68-76. https://journal.espe.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/revista-serie-zoologica/es/article/view/1399
Utamy, R. F., Sonjaya, H., Ishii, Y., Hasan, S., Nazira, M., Taufik, M., & Januarti, E. (2021). Mixed cropping of dwarf napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum cv. Mott) with Indigofera (Indigofera zollingeriana) using an alley cropping system. The Open Agriculture Journal, 15, 111-118. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874331502115010111
Xu, N., Meng, L., Tang, F., Du, S., Xu, Y., Kuang, S., Lv, Y., Song, W., Li, Y., Qi, W., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Plant spacing effects on stem development and secondary growth in Nicotiana tabacum. Agronomy, 13(8), Artículo 2142. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13082142
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Felix Esteban Airahuacho Bautista, Renzo Arturo Paredes Villarreal , Yaneline Nilda Hidalgo-Vasquez , Oscar Enrique Arbañil Huaman, Rufino Maximo Maguiña-Maza (Autor/a)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.





















