Fungi associated with sorghum seeds and persistence of Fusarium after surface disinfestation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/9vxd1n34Keywords:
Sorghum, blotter test, seed health, plant disease diagnosis, fungal communityAbstract
Introduction. The distinction between superficial colonization and internal infection by Fusarium spp. in sorghum (Sorghum spp.) seeds is limited when using conventional diagnostic methods, hindering the interpretation of inoculum localization. Objective. To characterize the fungal community associated with commercial sorghum seeds and to evaluate the persistence of Fusarium spp. after surface disinfestation as an indicator of the likely localization of the inoculum. Materials and methods. The study was conducted at the Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná of the Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Oro Verde, Entre Ríos, Argentina, between November 2024 and November 2025. Seeds from thirty commercial hybrids were evaluated using a blotter test without surface disinfestation (200 seeds per hybrid). Fungal genera were identified, and their incidence (%) was recorded. Based on Fusarium spp. incidence, twelve sentinel hybrids were selected and subjected to a blotter test with surface disinfestation (2 % NaOCl for 2 min; 100 seeds per hybrid) to assess pathogen persistence. The analysis was descriptive, based on the comparison of incidence before and after treatment. Results. Sixteen fungal genera were identified, with Alternaria, Fusarium, and Cladosporium as the most prevalent. Fusarium spp. showed variation among hybrids, with an incidence range of 0-78 % in the evaluation without disinfestation. In sentinel hybrids, surface disinfestation resulted in variable reductions, with high values in some hybrids, suggesting the removal of mainly superficial inoculum, whereas in others pathogen persistence was observed after treatment. Conclusion. The combination of blotter test and surface disinfestation allowed the characterization of fungi associated with commercial sorghum seeds and the analysis of Fusarium spp. persistence in relation to its likely localization within the seed. Differential patterns among hybrids allowed the interpretation of inoculum origin and highlighted the usefulness of the method for seed health evaluation and preventive management.
Downloads
References
Batzer, J. C., Shirazi, A., Gill, D., Platner-Heidt, E., Nicolaus, K., Bray, A., Mohan, K., Mathew, F. M., & Mueller, D. S. (2024). Seedborne fungal detection differs with seed assay method, and fungal diversity and abundance are impacted by fungicide treatment, harvest timing and storage environment. PhytoFrontiers, 4(4), 767-780. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTOFR-06-24-0076-R
Denancé, N., & Grimault, V. (2022). Seed pathway for pest dissemination: The ISTA Reference Pest List, a bibliographic resource in non-vegetable plant species. EPPO Bulletin, 52(2), 434-445. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12834
Ekwomadu, T. I., & Mwanza, M. (2023). Fusarium fungi pathogens, identification, adverse effects, disease management, and global food security: A review of the latest research. Agriculture, 13(9), Article 1810. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091810
Gebeyaw, M. (2020). Review on: Impact of seed-borne pathogens on seed quality. American Journal of Plant Biology, 5(4), 77-81. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20200504.11
Kesho, A., & Abebe, W. (2020). Detection of seed-borne fungi associated with some cereals and legume crops of seeds grown in main season at Holetta Agricultural Research Center. American Journal of Life Sciences, 8(5), 91-95. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20200805.11
International Seed Testing Association. (2025). International rules for seed testing (2025 ed.). International Seed Testing Association.
Leslie, J. F., & Summerell, B. A. (2006). The Fusarium laboratory manual. Blackwell Publishing.
Mancini, V., Murolo, S., & Romanazzi, G. (2016). Diagnostic methods for detecting fungal pathogens on vegetable seeds. Plant Pathology, 65(5), 691-703. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12515
Martín, I., Gálvez, L., Guasch, L., & Palmero, D. (2022). Fungal pathogens and seed storage in the dry state. Plants, 11(22), Article 3167. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223167
Mastin, A. J., Gottwald, T. R., van den Bosch, F., Cunniffe, N. J., & Parnell, S. (2020). Optimising risk-based surveillance for early detection of invasive plant pathogens. PLoS Biology, 18(10), Article e3000863. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000863
McGrath, O., & Burke, K. (2024). Binomial confidence intervals for rare events: Importance of defining margin of error relative to magnitude of proportion. The American Statistician, 78(4), 437-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2024.2350445
Munkvold, G. P. (2009). Seed pathology progress in academia and industry. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 47, 285-311. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081916
Otegui, M. E., Andrade, F., Cirilo, A., & Mercau, J. (2023). Fecha de siembra. En F. Andrade, M. E. Otegui, A. Cirilo, & S. Uhart (Eds.), Ecofisiología y manejo del cultivo de maíz (pp. 311-327). MAIZAR.
Parikka, P., Hakala, K., & Tiilikkala, K. (2012). Expected shifts in Fusarium species’ composition on cereal grain in northern Europe due to climate change. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 29(10), 1543-1555. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2012.680613
Parnell, S., van den Bosch, F., Gottwald, T. R., & Gilligan, C. A. (2017). Surveillance to inform control of emerging plant diseases: an epidemiological perspective. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 55, 591-610. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035334
Reed, R. C., Bradford, K. J., & Khanday, I. (2022). Seed germination and vigor: ensuring crop sustainability in a changing climate. Heredity, 128, 450-459. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-022-00497-2
Sauer, D. B., & Burroughs, R. (1986). Disinfection of seed surfaces with sodium hypochlorite. Phytopathology, 76, 745-749.
Sautua, F. J., Scandiani, M. M., Gordo, M., Carmona, M. A., Tartabini, M. L., & Luque, A. G. (2018). Detection and chemical control of Cercospora sojina infecting soybean seed in Argentina. Tropical Plant Pathology, 43, 552-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-018-0245-x
Sautua, F. J., Casey, S. A., Zapata, R. L., Scandiani, M. M., & Carmona, M. A. (2019). A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds. Summa Phytopathologica, 45(2), 197-199. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-5405/185396
Scandiani, M. M., Formento, A. N., & Luque, A. G. (2021). Identificación de patógenos en semillas de maíz. Syngenta.
Senigalia, R. L. C., Kratz, D., Ferrari, C., & Santin, D. (2020). Restrição hídrica em teste de sanidade de diásporos de Myracrodruon urundeuva Fr. All. Brazilian Journal of Development, 6(7), 47142-47158. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n7-564
Shabana, Y. M., Ghoneem, K. M., Rashad, Y. M., Arafat, N. S., Fitt, B. D. L., Richard, B., & Qi, A. (2022). Distribution and biodiversity of seed-borne pathogenic and toxigenic fungi of maize in Egypt and their correlations with weather variables. Plants, 11(18), Article 2347. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11182347
Thomas-Sharma, S., Abdurahman, A. A., Ali, S., Andrade-Piedra, J. L., Bao, S., Charkowski, A. O., Crook, D., Kadian, M., Kromann, P., Struik, P. C., Torrance, L., Garrett, K. A., & Forbes, G. A. (2016). Seed degeneration in potato: the need for an integrated seed health strategy to mitigate the problem in developing countries. Plant Pathology, 65(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12439
Vishunavat, K., Prabakar, K., & Anand, T. (2023). Seed health: Testing and management. In M. Dadlani, & D. K. Yadava (Eds.), Seed Science and Technology (pp. 335-364). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5888-5_14
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Los datos que respaldan los resultados de este estudio están disponibles a solicitud razonable al autor.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pablo Daniel Velazquez (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
